Berger,
John. Ways of Seeing. New York: Viking, 1973.
The first essay discusses how the importance and
understanding of images changed with the possibilities of their unlimited
mechanical reproduction. Inspired by Benjamin, Berger argues that a
relationship between a person and an image is always under attack from power
structures (such as authoritative texts, marketing strategies, placing of
images in specially constructed places) which aims at mystifying the human past—something
that privileged social groups aspire to use in order to keep people distanced
from their past. Berger argues that a proper interpretation/signification of
any text should, first, involve a clear understanding of one’s own historical
(and social) position, the use of one’s own plane of lived experience. “A
people or a class which is cut off from its own past is far less free to choose
and to act as a people or class than one that has been able to situate itself
in history. This is why – and this is the only reason why – the entire art of
the past has now become a political issues.” (33)
The third essay deals with the ways a women’s social
presence is constructed as that of a passive object: whether a man’s social
presence is defined by what he can do to objects around him, a woman’s social presence
is constructed by “what can and cannot be done to her.” (46) As a result, “a
woman must continually watch herself… She is almost continually accompanied by
her own image of herself… And so she comes to consider the surveyor and the
surveyed within her as the two constituent yet always distinct elements of her
identity as a woman.” (46) By watching herself with men’s eyes, women turn
themselves into objects.
The fifth essay deals with oil painting as a way to possess
things and, hence, the world. The seventh essay discusses the temporal and
consumerist aspects of publicity images in the contemporary world. “The
spectator-buyer is meant to envy herself as she will become if she buys the
product. She is meant to imagine herself transformed by the product into an
object of envy for others, an envy which will then justify her loving herself.
One could put this another way: the publicity image steals her love of herself
as she is, and offers it back to her for the price of the product” (134): true,
but once the spectator-buyer invests her own meanings into this product, this
relationship stops being entirely passive, as Berger puts it, and becomes more
active on her behalf. “Publicity is, in essence, nostalgic. It has to sell the
past to the future” (139). Therefore, an extensive use of everything related to
history, mythology, poetry, etc.
“The purpose of publicity is to make the spectator marginally
dissatisfied with his present way of life. Not with the way of life of society,
but with his own within it. It suggest that if he buys what it is offering, his
life will become better” (142).
No comments:
Post a Comment